Six grounds for refusal and specific actions of the creditor in each case
-
You won your case in arbitration, but the state court rejected your writ of execution. Is that the end?
-
Did you know that a court decision denying a writ of execution cannot be appealed—and what alternatives remain?
-
What six grounds give the court the right to refuse—and how can each of them be addressed before filing an application?
The creditor received an arbitration award for 42,000 euros. He went through the entire process and filed an application to the state court for a writ of execution. Six weeks later, the application was denied. The court found that the defendant had not been properly notified of one of the hearings.
There is a decision. There is no writ of execution. The money is out of reach.
What does the law say?
Article 536 of the Civil Procedure Law of Latvia establishes a closed list of grounds for refusing to issue a writ of execution based on an arbitration court decision. This list is exhaustive—there are no other grounds. If none of these grounds apply, the court is obligated to issue the writ.
Important: a state court’s decision to deny a writ of execution is not subject to appeal. This is clearly stated. This is why it is so important to address all risks in advance.
Ground one: the arbitration agreement was invalid
The court will refuse arbitration if the arbitration agreement was not concluded in accordance with the rules established by law—an oral agreement without written execution, signed by an unauthorized person, or a reservation in the terms that the defendant did not accept.
How to prevent: Ensure that the arbitration clause is signed by an authorized representative of both parties and is in writing (including electronic document exchange in accordance with the 2024 amendments).
Ground two: the defendant was not properly notified
This is the most common ground for refusal in practice. If the arbitral tribunal sent notices to the wrong address, failed to acknowledge receipt, or violated established procedures, the state court may refuse.
How to prevent: Before filing a claim, check the defendant’s current legal address in the Register of Enterprises. Include it in the claim. If the address changes during the proceedings, notify the arbitration tribunal immediately. Ensure that the case file contains proof of all notifications.
Ground three: the arbitral tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction
If the decision resolves issues that are not covered by the arbitration agreement or that, by law, cannot be the subject of arbitration proceedings, the court will dismiss the decision on the grounds of exceeding its jurisdiction.
How to prevent arbitration: formulate claims strictly within the framework of the agreement containing the arbitration clause. Do not include claims from other contracts or legal relationships unless they are covered by the agreement.
Ground four: the composition of the arbitral tribunal did not meet the requirements
If a judge was appointed in violation of regulations or did not meet the requirements of the law, this is grounds for refusal.
How to prevent: Work only with permanently operating, registered arbitration courts. The Riga Arbitration Court operates in full compliance with the law and its regulations, so this risk is minimal.
Ground five: the decision violates public order
It is rarely applied—only in cases of clear conflict with the fundamental principles of Latvian law. In practice, courts apply this criterion restrictively.
How to prevent: Don’t make demands that violate the law. The amount of the penalty should not be clearly disproportionate.
Ground six: the dispute is not arbitrable
Certain categories of disputes cannot be considered by arbitration: labor disputes, disputes over real estate rights in some cases, disputes with consumers under certain conditions.
How to prevent: Before filing a claim, ensure that the dispute relates to commercial legal relations between entrepreneurs and does not fall within the exceptions of Article 5 of the Law on Arbitration Courts.
What to do if you still get a refusal
Although the refusal decision cannot be appealed, the creditor has several options.
Option one: eliminate the grounds for enforcement and file a new application for a writ of execution. This is possible if the grounds can be eliminated—for example, if the problem was the defendant’s out-of-date address and it can be proven that they actually received the notices through another means.
The second option is to file a lawsuit in a state court on the merits of the claim. If the arbitration award cannot be enforced, the creditor has the right to file a regular lawsuit in a state court. The arbitration award does not have prejudicial effect, but it can be used as evidence.
The third option is to file a new claim in arbitration, correcting the procedural violations. If the basis for the refusal is a procedural violation that can be corrected in a new trial, this is one option.
The main conclusion
Prevention is the best cure. Most denials of writs of execution are due to preventable errors: incorrect defendant’s address in the claim, lack of notification confirmation, and demands that go beyond the agreed-upon terms.
Checklist before filing a claim in arbitration
The arbitration clause is valid and signed by authorized persons
The defendant’s current legal address has been verified in the Register of Enterprises.
The demands are strictly within the framework of the agreement with the arbitration clause
The dispute relates to arbitrable commercial legal relations
During the process, keep all confirmation of sending notifications
The amount of the penalty is proportionate to the violation
A writ of execution isn’t a formality. It’s the final key to your money. Don’t give them any reason to refuse.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.